08 Apr 2009
This just in from REEEP Partner Organisation Eco Ltd, who are working with Practical Action to promote a new report from the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) and PISCES (Policy Innovation Systems for Clean Energy Security), a five year Research Programme Consortium funded by the UK’s Department for International Development (DFID) and co-ordinated by the African Centre for Technology Studies (ACTS) in Kenya.
The report documents the poverty impacts from biofuel and other bioenergy projects through fifteen case studies from Africa, Asia and Latin America. The research aimed to assess the impacts that different types of local-level bioenergy initiatives can have on rural livelihoods. The case studies show that local, small-scale bioenergy initiatives can bring real and sustainable benefits to poor communities in developing countries.
Today, at least 1.6 billion people in the world have no access to electricity, and over 2 billion still rely on traditional biomass for their everyday cooking and heating needs. It is increasingly recognised that improved access to energy services is essential if the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) are to be achieved.
The 15 cases were selected to highlight the use of a range of Bioenergy resources including natural Bioresources (plants which are naturally grown as opposed to cultivated crops); Bioresidues from existing forestry, agricultural or industrial activities; and purpose grown energy crops, better known as Biofuels. In order to investigate the full scope of bioenergy applications, the matching of these resources to a range of energy needs (cooking, mobility and electricity for lighting and communication etc) was specified.
The study confirms that a much greater efficiency in natural resource use is possible; but long-term planning and regulation play a crucial role, and broad stakeholder collaboration in the market chain is key to successful start-up. Local and productive energy end-uses can develop virtuous circles of livelihood benefits, but it is also beneficial to incorporate options for flexibility and diversification to reduce producer risk. To ensure vulnerable people are not disadvantaged by the potential negative impacts, social safeguards need to be in place.
The study can be downloaded from the publications page of the PISCES website.
leave a comment